General
Commercial transactions between related parties of a group may not often be marketed with the same manner, as between two independent firms. Payment for goods or services from one party provided by another party may diverge from market prices for reasons of marketing or financing policy or to minimize tax cost (Transfer Price). To ensure that the tax cost of a group (or multinational enterprises) is divided fairly, it is important that transactions between related parties are the same or similar to transactions between independent companies. In article 9 of the OECD model Tax Convention, this is defined as the “Arm’s Length Principle”. Article 9 deals with the adjustments to the profits that may be made for tax purposes where transactions have been made between associated enterprises (parent and subsidiary companies and companies under common control) on other than the “Arm’s Length” terms.
According to Article 9 of the OECD Model, “associated enterprises” are:
1. an enterprise of a contracting state participating directly or indirectly in management, control or the capital of an enterprise of the contracting state or
2. the same person participates directly or indirectly in the management, control or capital of an enterprise of a contracting state and an enterprise of the other contracting state.
Related Legislation in Greece
Law 3728/2008
Ministerial Decision (Protocol Number A2 - 8092/31.12.2008)
Article 39 of Income Tax Law 2238/1994
Article 42e of Corporate Law 2190/1920
Pursuant to the above recently released legislation, rules are being introduced in intercompany transactions “Transfer pricing ruling” for the first time in Greece.
RULES REGARDING INTERCOMPANY TRANSACTIONS
I. Ministry of Development – Market Control Authorities
According to Article 26 (L. 3278/2008), all types of companies operating in Greece (Greek S.A. entities, Limited Liability Companies, personal companies “OE” & “EE” and branches of foreign companies or any other permanent establishments in Greece) are obliged to apply the same or similar terms for their intercompany transactions, with the terms applied between independent companies. Such rules must be in accordance with the OECD’s “arm’s length” principles. Intercompany transactions are the transactions between affiliated companies as these are defined under article 42e of the Greek Corporate Law (L. 2190/1920): direct or indirect control of the majority in capital participation / votes or management.
DOCUMENTATION FILES
For compliance controlling of the above rules, the companies have to substantiate and document their intercompany transactions with the preparation of a transfer pricing study including the following files:
Regarding “group companies” which have a Greek parent company, the “Basic file” should be prepared, which contains:
1. Group information:
Organization chart to include all the associated companies, branches, etc
Description of the business and business strategy
Group invoicing policy (invoice flow, agreements, transactions volume)
Ownership description on royalties and “know how” rights with in the group
List with any “Transfer Pricing Agreements” that the group entities may have received approval from foreign tax authorities
2. Company information
Analysis of the transactions with the affiliated entities (charges description, invoice flow, amounts)
Comparative analysis
Description and documentation of the Transfer Pricing method followed, as these are provided by OECD guidelines
Regarding the Greek subsidiaries of a foreign group, the “Greek documentation file” should be in place, which contains the same details as above.
The “Basic” and the “Greek documentation” files must be sent to the relevant authorities within 30 days from the day the authorities make such a request.
Files must be updated with any changes to the company or the group.
ALL THE DOCUMENTATION FILES ARE IN GREEK
Except the above files, companies must submit a list of their intercompany transactions every year within four months and fifteen days following the end of the fiscal year. This list contains per business item and signed agreement, the number and the value of these transactions, per intra-group entity. The list is submitted to the relevant office of the commerce control authority of the Ministry of Development.
TRANSFER PRICING METHODS
According to the Ministerial decision published, the transfer pricing methods that are recognized as applicable are the following:
Comparable Uncontrolled Price method (CUP)
Resale Price Method (RPM)
Cost Plus Method (C+)
Other “non traditional” methods, such as “Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM)”, and the “Transactional Profit Split Method (TPSM)” may also be used, but only in cases the above three traditional methods cannot be implemented.
TRANSFER PRICING WIDE RANGE
Released directives provide guidelines not only on the transfer price methods and files, but also the used internal and externally comparative information, the control of comparability of used information, the source of information from databases and the determination of prices of intercompany transactions from a selection of acceptable prices.
In reference to the group of acceptable prices, it is clarified that in the cases where from the application of the followed method of transfer pricing and the use of the comparative elements, an assortment of prices or profit results; what is rejected is the lowest 25% of prices and the highest 25% of prices, with the use of quadrants.
In this case, that is to say, becomes determination of quadrants of the total prices or profit of sample that was used, as follows:
Q1 = first quadrant = 25ο
Q2 = median = 50ο
Q3 = third quadrant = 75ο
Therefore, what is considered compatible with the “arm’s length” principle is any price between the first and the third quadrant, with the condition that this choice is justified sufficiently.
EXCEPTIONS
1. Companies which have an annual turnover of up to 1.000.000 € (If the company exceeds 1.000.000 € for two (2) consecutive years then the third year is no longer exempted)
2. Contracts or transactions between associated companies with a total value of less than 200.000 € annually
3. When transactions are made concerning shares or partnership units
4. Transactions related to real estate property
5. Companies under L. 89/1967 and L. 3427/2005 (article 27), so called “Law 89” offices
SANCTIONS, PENALTIES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE
In case the companies do not comply with the above obligations there are fines as follows:
10% of the value of the transactions, for failure of the company to submit the transactions list, or failure to submit it on time
Penalties, according to the Market Regulation Code, are applied when the “arm’s length” principle is not followed, i.e. penalty of 5.000,00€ and criminal sanctions
All the non-compliant companies have to be notified about the above administrative decisions for sanctions within thirty (30) days
The company can make an appeal against the above decisions of the authorities within five (5) days of the above notification of sanctions
The Minister of Development has to accept or reject the appeal within ten (10) days
In the case of rejection of the appeal, the company can make an appeal against the above decision to the competent Administrative Court within sixty (60) days
The last appeal is legally acceptable when the company has paid 20% of the relevant penalty
In case there is breach of obligations (paragraph 1, article 26, L. 3728/2008), after examination of the “documentation file” and “transaction statement”, the competent commerce authorities promptly inform the relevant Tax Authorities to apply the provisions of the tax legislation and impose the anticipated tax sanctions.
II. Ministry of Finance – Corporate Taxation
According to the current Income Tax Law (L.2238/94 article 39):
“When contracts for selling goods or rendering services are signed between local entities or a foreign and a local entity and in these contracts the price is set at an unjustifiably higher or lower rate, per case, then the one that is actually realized if the contract was signed with a different party in accordance with the prevailing market conditions at the time of the drafting of the contract, the resulting difference is considered a profit of the entity, who received less or paid more, in terms of price or remuneration, per case. This difference increases the net profits of the entity that appear in its books, without affecting the books and records’ validity.”
Therefore, the difference will be subject to Corporate Income Tax (current rate is 25%).
“The difference resulting from the provisions of this article increases the gross revenue resulting from the books of the entity, in order for this revenue to be taken into consideration for calculating taxes, duties and contributions to other taxations.”
As a result there will be additional taxation in further tax assessments (VAT, WHT, etc).
“A one-off penalty is levied upon the entity, subject to the provisions of this article, set at 10% of the amount of the difference resulting from the provisions of this article. This penalty is levied regardless of the imposition of additional taxes, surcharges and miscellaneous penalties as they are described by the effective rulings. The percentage of the imposed penalty cannot be the subject of an administrative settlement of the difference”.
What results is a 10% independent penalty over the Transfer Pricing difference.